Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5296
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJarad, Tanya-
dc.contributor.authorHamad, Murtadha-
dc.contributor.authorAlrawi, Azmi-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-22T19:59:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-22T19:59:03Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-01-
dc.identifier.issn1005-0086-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5296-
dc.description.abstractOver the 3-decades ago and more, Fractal Geometry (FG) has received a lot of attention of a number of researchers, with robust application and excellent properties in relation to the scenario of the current research. A crucial part is played by the Fractal Dimension (FD) in Analysis of complex objects that have not been analyzed in geometry of Euclidean. FD is an essential side of FG in presenting indicative applications in various fields of study consist of pattern recognition, image processing, graphics of computer, and much more. Image analysis is a crucial technique for processing of image to define image characteristics such as smoothness, roughness, texture, etc., and is only potential via FG. Because of this, many more techniques for estimating FD were evolved. The main goal of this paper is to supply a global review of new evolutions in surface ruggedness analyzes and a general overview of the various concepts, how they work, the benefits and limitations, and how the different concepts used for estimating the FD depend on various algorithms. This paper also discuss various factors that affect the estimation of FD; it discusses the kinds of similarity properties, sampling process, spatial resolution, spectral band, box-height criteria and region of interest. We have also attempt to offer the FG area-oriented application in the core area. In many types of literature, there are several contradictory findings regarding the effects of various parameters during estimate dimension analyses. Majorly it has been distinguished that the estimation of FD will be affected by the range of gray scale, texture property, color distance, color property, and the other factors already mentioned, so this paper will be advantageous to authors to choose accurate estimation of FD. Fortunately, various algorithms result in various results, even using database images of the same type, so the choice of the suitable method is, therefore, a great challenge to estimate accurately. It is thus necessary to develop an in-depth and appropriate under-standing for selecting the suitable and a robust algorithm for better and more accurate analysis of roughness. Also, we proposed using heuristic methods in order to estimate how fractal techniquesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJOURNAL OF OPTOELECTRONICS LASERen_US
dc.subjectFractal Dimensionen_US
dc.subjectFractal Geometryen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Similarityen_US
dc.subjectSurface roughness images (color and grayscale).en_US
dc.titleFractal Dimension Estimating Methods for Data Analyzing: Surveyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:قسم علوم الحاسبات

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Doc1.pdf282.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.