Syntactic Analysis of Selected MSc. Theses of Graduate Candidature at the University of Anbar

Abstract

ABSTRACT Whereas failing in observing some foregrounded syntactic topics, at phrasal, sentential and trans_ paragraph levels, by some MSc' candidates in handling their scientific quests wourd be problematic in the formarity of structure and functionality, their "theses" would develop uneven argumentation and communication. The paragraph, being highly conceptualized expository scientific texting, needs specific progression moves to have sound, linear, parallel or mixed evolution of topics meant to screw unpredictable data in scientific testing. It is observed that in each paragraph of scientific text the directives followed by inte*ogatives will secure a good stance to ericit scientifi c argumentation, the rhemat ic topicarization mostly presented with passivized, or nominalized structures to initiate progression and enhance findings; whereas the exposition of data, and then of findings is preferably done functionality. with conditionals and copulatives of high Sequencing of thematic - rhematic progression, at sentential and trans-sentential levels, is to be syllogistic. In foregrounding certain linguistic features in scientific texting, the questioning followed in sifting findings would be highly affordable. The introduction ofscientific thesis lends a historical context to the research by relating it to prior studies in the field. In most cases, vllt the thesis presented is performed to address specific scientific issue and encapsulate background information with reference to established knowledge and findings. As such the research mapped the rerevance of the thesis projected to its concerns from the overviewed position. However, the method constitutes a substantive part of the study; essentially it enlists some procedural formulae and step by step description of the analysis made. It arso describes the model made, the method viewed and the soundness of results of findings,, which are presented in narrative mode. The procedures folrowed the process for data handling and an evolution of the procedure followed. It also describes the model made, the method viewed and the soundness of results of findings, usua,y presented in narrative mode. The discussion interprets the significance of the research and justifies the procedure. It states the rimitation of the findings. It readdresses the thesis and conclusion in the light of the evidence provided. To linage the text, the discussion draws distinct impressions about the relation between the subject matters and how the results are organized and presented. A prior, thought-unit intends in sentence or paragraph of scientific texting should be compounded. The structuring of content is to be implemented through grammatical correctness, sound coherence and unity, close knitting of parts and proper placement of units. IX Directness of expressions should also be accompanied by simplicity with the least room for embellished language. To express conceptions and lead progression via axiomatic theorem with exactitude economy and precision in detailing should be embalmed.